Electricians EMS: A Year of Losses The balance is unfavorable. The Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation declared constitutional decree extinction of Luz y Fuerza del Centro. The Federal Board of Conciliation and Arbitration was terminated employment relationships of all SME's electricians, as well as the collective bargaining agreement. The industrial integration has been circumvented, as well as the replacement management. The abnormality continuous association.
1. Introduction
The commemoration is no time or political balance but anecdotes. A serious assessment is necessarily critical and self-critical. All that has happened should be kept in mind but most important is to examine the causes of conflict and its consequences.
expect from the SME to submit to the union movement an examination of the causes that led to the conflict, the lessons learned and conclusions. However, we believe that it never will.
The various participants presented the situation based on some insufficient data and conflicting personal political assessments, direct insults and insult each other, masking the political confrontation with the state.
The FTE want to present their reflections on the facts, the historical, political, technical, industrial and trade unions.
The policy is tested in practice and the facts have been confirmed, unfortunately, we did the signs to chance. The balance is unfavorable to smeitas electricians and all Mexicans. Not only has there been many missing, there is also lack of good prospects and reiteration of technical formulas, economically and politically, questionable and impractical. Inside
union remains an abnormal situation resulting from the statutory alteration, in the EMS has no legal personality established. There are 15 months of repeated irregularities. The union is broken, discarding its internal structure, violently polarized and a large part in apathy.
The "leadership" union not to rise to the occasion. The policy followed is outdated electrical historically, the proposals involve the return of more than 50 years ago, have no technical basis and policy, ignoring the process of electrical work and denying the nationalization of the electricity industry.
The legal path followed by lawyers, led by Nestor de Buen and Raul Carranca, has been disastrous. Have not won a single case. No action has been useless.
Solidarity was disdain, internally and externally, nationally and internationally. Alliances have been with the union charros mining and metallurgy. With the partnership, all limited to trick the users unhappy with poor collection of electricity.
At the end of one year, the resistance continues. An electrical sector remains in deployment. But misinformation persists, the political analysis is lacking, you can not even intervene in the "assemblies" Legal documents are secret and domes decisions are unilateral and tax.
Now the conflict has shifted to the electoral process of 2012. Although much remains to be bet on the PRI and promotes legislative reforms, hands over to the Electricity Act, in abstraction from history, politics and the struggle itself electrician.
2. Poor appreciation of the relation of forces
We said internally and inconvenience caused, "the post-election conflict should be resolved internally," none of the contenders is considering the industrial situation, vulnerable to all levels, both lack electricity policy. "
occasion of union elections in July 2009, Martin Esparza and Alejandro Munoz was commissioned to draw outside the conflict, both in the lower level and dirty. On the social networking circle mud. In making the recuentro of the election, the results were very tight but the data is not checked. Munoz Esparza challenging them but Camacho.
with incomplete documentation and altered, Esparza Making Note apply to the Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare (STPS). On October 5, 2005, the agency denied recognition. That reason
an angry reaction from Esparza and supporters. Challenger, the strike threatened to erupt at Luz y Fuerza del Centro (LFC), without there being any arrangement, and less coverage. The federal government, in turn, threatened to use force in the State. The message was clear. But Esparza answered "here waiting for you!" Inviting confrontation. So
happened. The morning of October 11, 2009, the nation learned that the Federal Police had occupied the premises of LFC previous midnight. That meant that all electricians were out of their workplaces. Immediately, the federal government announced the publication of a decree by which CFLs extinct. Smeitas
All were shocked, without being able to respond coherently. Munoz Esparza and erroneous conclusions were drawn. The first proposed "regresenos our company," the second "liquidense." Unit was attempted but was ephemeral, the fracture union was more profound, sponsored by the government. Integrating
nationalized the electricity industry and in this context, employers rely on the substitution by the Commission Federal de Electricidad (CFE), Mexico proposed FTE from the first day of the occupation of LFC. The FTE analyze the facts in advance and alert the police intervention. "Not going to happen," said one retired green.
Two years earlier, in 2008, the FTE warned that the assault was underway with the attempted military occupation of LFC. On 16 March of that day, in the morning, the relevant decree was published in the Official Journal, it was withdrawn from internet at noon after having reached a contractual agreement for the revision, the union government to impose an agreement productivity Esparza group kept secret and was signed unilaterally.
In the post-election conflict, pride aside Esparza their basic duties as a union priority to their personal interest. Since the beginning of its management, had resulted in a disproportionate cult of personality via the corruption and repression. The internal discontent was growing, without expressed correctly. In the July 2009 elections, most do not vote for Munoz but against Esparza.
however, did not want to take the required reading before the situation. In exchange for note-taking, Esparza preferred to engage the union and labor supply, like a bet on the fence.
The first question of balance is that there was a proper appreciation of the political relationship of forces. First, there was a severe blow to the concept of SME internal on union democracy, limited the right to vote. The union "More" democratic, with nearly a century of frequent polls, was unable to clarify internally an election. Second, to impose their particular interest, Esparza and his group, who dominated the union hegemonic since 1989, elated by the incense, believed that LFC was his property and could proceed at will, as if there was no class struggle. Devoid of analysis, they assumed the opposite would be carried only watching.
was not so. The coup was suitable from outside and from within. The EMS was discussed in a trade dispute, giving news and evidence of internal corruption, which annexed it ended up costing dearly everyone. The Mexican unions watched from afar. The right-wing government in office, compared to a SME with no union representation and leadership confused, found the time to intervene. Martin Esparza he offered all the excuses the government, and there was the confrontation with the state, in a clearly unfavorable relation of forces to the union. Occupation police
Light and Power Company on October 11, 2009
3. Denial of the electric nationalization
LFC
The extinction was decreed on 11 October 2009, its immediate predecessor was the March 16, 2008, but his clearance was allowed from September 1, 1960. On 27 September of that year was decreed the nationalization of the electricity industry.
the FNTIC electricians, after STERM; drew the right conclusions before the nationalization. In 1966 he signed the first agreement for industrial integration, and in 1969, the second that she joined the ERM, leaving the process shortly.
In 1974 he agreed to the liquidation of the companies, who possessed only 2% of the shares themselves which would have become extinct by 1999. In 1975 he passed the first law of the Electric Power Public Service (LSPEE). The Act directs the Federal Commission Electricity to provide the public service of electric power throughout the country.
STERM With the momentum, then SUTERM, the full interconnection of the National Electrical System. In 1973-75 were offered to the SME unit in excellent condition, with no response. Worse, in 1976, there was a serious betrayal of the democratic trend of SUTERM was politically and militarily repressed by the state.
With the blow to the democratic trend was interrupted nationalization. Later, in 1992, by the Pact of Necaxa, the SME support Salinas de Gortari, who promoted the LSPEE regressive reforms. This will start illegal privatization process already exceeds 50% of total generation capacity nationwide. The regression of nationalization has become the de-nationalization.
return in 1994, was created LFC in the worst condition: no generating capacity and charging the historical debt of foreign companies. Almost all the energy that LFC distributed in the Valley of Mexico was purchased in bulk to the CFE.
are 50 years of separation of the nationalized electricity industry, refusing to integration pretexts always. Ironically, is undertaking a scheme of privilege within the same industry, in an interconnected region. LFC long remained in a state of bankruptcy. But always eluded industrial integration. The scheme parceled
companies also corresponded a union company, a concept historically exceeded, especially in strategic industries such as electricity. That led to a parochial vision, regardless of the national electric development, leading to serious technical and economic weaknesses. This was aggravated by the illegal electric privatization process, widespread in 2008, with the counter-reformation energetic approved by all political parties.
privatization in the country poaching is accelerated and includes the Valley of Mexico where, years ago, there were many private permits generation and distribution networks of LFC are used by private generators in remote self-supply mode. Necaxa
Pact turned my dear to the nation and reverted to electricians. In 2006, the Supreme Audit Office of the Federation did an analysis recommending that the federal courts the extinction of LFC. In 2008 and in 2009 attempted violent. Separating
electric industry nationalized, refuse systematically to the integration of it, was a catastrophic historical error.
4. Ill-founded legal Via
Given the aggression of the state in 2009, the union response was limited to defending a feud. "Regresenos our company," was the slogan. From that limited premise, set up a "strategy" is erroneous, the facts prove it.
The government was forced to put the service in the region by the CFE
because so indicated by the LSPEE. That operation was the only option because, despite the increased privatization poaching, this considers the generation but not the transmission or electricity distribution.
But instead of responding in the context of industrial integration, becoming part of the nationalized electricity industry and agree on the respective agreement, it was decided only by constitutional decree rejection of extinction, without industrial-technical arguments.
The first step was to trust that Members would interpose a constitutional controversy before the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN). That is, the conflict was in the hands of political parties. Time passed legal and legislators refused to use the resource, or even meet the minimum signatures.
worth noting that the government would resort to the Federal Board of Conciliation and Arbitration (JFCA) to bring an economic collective nature that would terminate the individual and collective relations of electricians. So it happened. System management and disposition of assets (SAF) promoted a "special action" with the same objectives.
In response, the union and Nestor de Buen filed an amparo
decontextualized he received a provisional suspension of a federal judge for the Board not to carry the award devastating. However, under the final suspension was denied. So, was promoted to the Court attract the case.
On July 5, 2010, the full Court determined by unanimously that Calderon's decree is constitutional. The Court, however, did not address labor issues considering that of other bodies.
In ruling the Court freed the Board to issue the award. On August 31, 2010, the Board determined that arose on the termination of individual and collective relations of LFC service workers, and that was concluding the collective bargaining agreement (CST) signed between LFC and the SME.
In the award states that although it is not the central issue, and since Nestor mention the replacement employer in its letter of reply to the discretion of SAE, not as proof of substitution and neither does, according to the Board. Consequently, the replacement employer refused by the CFE, from considerations of weak points in a resolution of a sixth federal judge in the Federal District. I take the opinion that judge on another matter (the note-taking) to reject the employer's replacement if there was no specific trial.
This situation was caused by the confusion introduced by Nestor in his writings. In them, regardless of the suit added a list of demands, including the mention, just the mention, without proof, of the replacement management. Being so politicized the case, Nestor leaving room mess that all instances unrelated rule against. In another lawsuit
still unresolved, in justified dismissal, claimed the SAE and the director of CFE for such dismissal. The SAE replied that among his duties the recruitment but not the settlement, the attorney for the CFE negotiations had been dismissed because the CFE trabajadotes never had any employment relationship with the plaintiffs.
When the Court decided, Martin Esparza and relatives, suddenly, proclaimed the employer's substitution that had been systematically denied, in public and in private. It was hoped that his lawyers straightened demand (for unfair dismissal) to refer formally to the replacement management. In its initial application, referred to the replacement pattern at the end of a list of demands, in vague terms and without evidence.
Meanwhile, the absence made the statutory election process, all union representatives left without legal personality from the July 14, 2010. Two days before the Board issued the award devastating, Good's lawyers had not gotten any expansion of the demand for formally invoking the replacement management. On August 31, 2010 the Board issued the award. The next day, Esparza announced that would get the extension.
At this time, the union had no personality legal to appear before the Board or to empower. The workers were not called to subscribe to any demand. Everything has been kept secret.
Some "advisors" proclaimed the end: "Patron substitute it now", as well as some Democratic Lawyers. Both failed the replacement employer does not operate automatically. In the absence of timely agreed by an agreement between the parties, it was necessary through formal labor demand. The arguments that make up the replacement employers are given, as well as testing. However, no such formal request.
This law prescribes the anus and the right was lost by omission.
remain alive several individual claims of nearly 3 000 electricians, including active, retired and settled, including the demand led by Esparza and others on unfair dismissal, which stirred the replacement management.
For these demands, the incident dealt with a SAE accumulation already approved and the corresponding trial began in January 2011.
September 27, the union said its lawyers had gone to the Board to file an injunction against the demolition award after he had spent more than 15 working days. The award demolition firm but not even the termination of relationships labor and the CST is a fact, although officially denied by the group of unofficial editors Esparza and even mention the issue.
The government's argument means that LFC is extinguished, the same lawyers Carranca Good and recognize it.
Thus, the facts show that the path followed by Nestor was not adequate. So much so that all legal remedies used are lost, not been a single success. By shuffling the issues and fiddling, focusing on the unconstitutionality of the decree, were omitted key labor issues, especially the formal invocation of the replacement management. Some have pointed
which, however, in dealing with the state that would deny the right. Javier Lozano's own secretary of labor, made haste to declare that it was inappropriate. Indeed, current legislation is not our only state that can twist its discretion. Said by Lozano, however, is only "expressions devoid of legal content."
The state is bad but the political analysis can not be reduced to the findings in black and white. The labor law is there but if not even a formal demand, never be carried out. The responsibility of the lawyers union is seriously questioned, as the "strategy" Esparza failed and advisers.
During this process, 28 000 electricians (64%) chose to go to the SAE to receive their settlements from the first three months.
5. Lack of independent electric politics
During the conflict has been absent independent Electric policy, the democratic electricians.
denying the nationalization and the conclusions of their own electricians, the speech was limited to the complaint. By refusing always to the integration of the nationalized electricity industry, it is easy to focus all energy to the CFE, confusing to the institution with the policy followed by the bureaucracy in turn.
The CFE own government and giving cause for questioning, to rely on contractors to service in the central region of the country. Obviously, the contractors have no technical experience and are interested only business.
immediately began direct attacks against vehicles and contract workers through outsourcing. These workers, from various parts of the country, working in precarious conditions plundered by the need and unemployment. But instead of questioning the policy followed by the State, smeitas proceeded against in a totally classless.
The CFE is accused of being inept, duck, even called it "company." Adjectives based on the discourse reveals a profound ignorance of the electricity industry was nationalized and everything is in superficiality. LFC
could never compare with the CFE, despite the illegal privatization. In the CFE are made key stages of the process of electrical work, by means which never operated LFC. For the rest, criticism has been on the periphery.
At first there was blackouts in several neighborhoods. That was taken as evidence of the ineptitude of the CFE. But has never been questioned that the city is lit, the public electricity service never been interrupted, industry, trade, offices, universities,
economy in general, continue to operate with electric power supplied.
trucks have been attacked but ignored that the CFE is holding the most important facilities, electrical substations, subtransmission and distribution networks, the operation and control center, etc.. The criticism, then, is stuck in the branches.
Moreover, the CFE already has in place investment plans to build new generation plants in the region, probably in the form PIE, the planning is proceeding, it is replacing LFC automated infrastructure and service marketing has been consolidating.
The center has been questioning the optical fiber, whose 330 km network of LFC were never finished. That is not the main problem, more serious is the granting of the 22 km of optical fiber network of the CFE, the radio spectrum and satellite communication.
In the collection of electricity to domestic consumers, the union has had a wide field of detection. It has been said that with the extinction of LFC, increased electric rates, encouraging users do not pay for the CFE, as they have no contract with this organization.
First they talked about an injunction, then it's over in complaints to the Office of Consumer Protection (Profeco) has been called a strike of payments and promoted the organization of users.
There are certainly errors and abuses in several cases but there is still a widespread phenomenon. The problem with electric rates did not begin in 2009, and is due to the extinction of LFC. There has been no recent lifting of tariffs in the Valley of Mexico, in consequence of the tariffs are set nationally, not local.
The tariff elevation is a consequence of the illegal privatization. While this is higher, the higher the rates. So will continue in the meantime not reverse privatization. With plans to increase privatization, tariffs will be increased. But, reversing the privatization is not a matter of Profeco.
The fight against illegal privatization is mentioned only in statements to the media, in virtually ignored. Not since 1992, when the union endorsed the Salinas regressive reforms to privatize the industry, has been the slightest criticism, not even a mention of the fact.
Obviously, there is also no coherent proposal on behalf of the electricity industry nationalized. Everything has been on the attack on the CFE which is precisely the nationalized electricity industry is the natural substitute pattern smeitas. Lack of political
Electric has been a feature of the union, in this context, it has become lamentable. When he insists on "regresenos our company" incurs a narrow vision, extremely limited, regardless of nationalized industry. That is incorrect.
This is compounded by the unilateral interpretation of the LSPEE and pretension to reform in order that it created a new electric company in the center of the country, replacing LFC, whose operating plant is discarded.
6. Improvisation anti-solidarity policy
The year has been admirable resistance of a significant number of electricians. Under conditions remained extremely difficult deployment. Hundreds of events, including rallies, marches, "assemblies" and other actions have been made. Unfortunately, actions have been improvised and spontaneous, made with great determination, but no program or goals.
In some cases, there have been attacks Peer electricians because the internal division is not exceeded. In most cases, even made possible the discussion. The level of information and analysis has been very low, almost zero.
Many retirees are outside the powdered movement in many groups.
divisions in the resistance has been uneven. Perhaps the Division is the most complete Toluca.
the absence of a program, the mobilization is politically and organizationally diluted. Mobilization can not, or should, be reduced to daily marches. Relevant is the combination of activities aimed at the construction of organization.
Upon the conflict, some suggested the task of organizing solidarity from the bottom, covering the country geographically. However, from the beginning it was decided by bureaucratic control and sectarian at all costs. The result was that the supports were diluted, many moved away, others continue to support but in other conditions.
was opted for alliances with the association charrismo especially with Napoleon Gomez Urrutia and Francisco Hernandez Juarez. The results are visible. These partnerships are harmful.
Something similar has happened to international solidarity. Since 2007, the EMS took the secretary general of the International Union of Trade Unions of Energy (TUI) of the Federation of Trade Unions (WFTU). In 1999-2005, the WSF played a major role in supporting the struggle led by the SME against the constitutional reform in electric field. This time, the WSF has been ignored, the general secretary of the TUI has had a participation of 0 (zero).
The reason is politics, Esparza group preferred an alliance with the ICFTU, especially the AFL-CIO American organizations responsible for the destruction of the Mexican labor movement. These devices have many dollars but its politics is anti-labor. They have not even been able to advise the union to file a proper complaint with the International Labour Organization (ILO), based in Geneva, Switzerland.
However, the WSF has mobilized unions of electricians and oil from several continents.
Despite the EMS union apparatus itself, the FSM organized in Athens, Greece International Conference of Solidarity with the SME. Several organizations came to Mexico to express their political and economic solidarity.
Instead of evaluating the efforts, Esparza was dedicated to publicly attack the WSF member organizations, for helping with organization, logistics and economic resources to the success of the event.
Thus, the domestic front and international solidarity has been negligible. The mobilization has continued with much enthusiasm but zero politics. In addition, the management towards workers has been repeated deceptions by talking non-existent agreements and promises.
union delegations Presence the energy sector in the world at the International Conference of Solidarity with the SME organized by the Federation of Trade Unions in solidarity
The FTE combative and concrete with our fellow electricians
7. In the line of Fujimori and Calderon
One sector that has received most attention are domestic users. From the outset it was proposed a strike call payments, inciting the population to not pay at the FEC, arguing that the contract they had was with LFC and not the CFE.
Much effort has been devoted to the campaign against the CFE from the mistakes and abuses that have occurred in the recovery of the service, however, is not widespread.
The limitation is that combat the effects but not causes. The necessary fight against the illegal privatization, to stop it and reverse it, is absent. Partial and superficial handling of the case involves serious risks. Input, does not clarify the problem and less socially organized.
The course is suitable to lift up the unreasoning anger. This strategy is widely studied by imperialism to know to take advantage of the situation.
The people in general you can not deceive or manipulate, because things are rolled against each other. So step in Peru, in times of Fugimori, who dedicated himself to skillfully exacerbate animosity toward the electrical service. After "Sensitized" to the users proceeded to privatize the electricity industry and achievement with applause from consumers who now have a situation worse.
So the hatred of the CFE does not justify the attack boost the institution which, again, represents the electrical industry nationalized. Tactically, is a political error because CFE is, we repeat, the pattern smeitas substitute. Of course, hatred of the CFE has been taken to the extreme because Esparza and others do not want to substitute the CFE as a pattern, they want your business "as they call." That is why they avoided the replacement management and, although the recently alluded level statements, the facts show that the right was lost by deliberate omission.
8.
union abnormality has been more than one year and the union is still in the abnormality of association. Normality was altered since July 2009 with a repeated refusal to correct. That has led the union to be certified without legal representation. Arguing
a strange concept of "trade union autonomy," the union has refused to settle their internal situation. However experience of over 9 decades, suddenly refused to follow the law. With it, you did a great favor to the state and its government.
In 2009, the STPS will Making negotiated Note to Martin Esparza and 12 representatives but have not properly credited the documentation. According to the union's constitution, Humberto Montes de Oca, secretary of the interior, had to assume temporarily the general representation of the union. However, he refused.
Amid the continuing internal division, Alejandro Munoz filed a complaint with the Board. This ruling determined that void the election was to recover the process. Martin Esparza under and lost, after a temporary suspension came the final negative. However, he insisted on refusing to reinstate the process.
in July 2010 was have statutory elections for half of the Central Committee of the union. Arguing that there was a special situation imposed on an "assembly" to be given a vote of confidence to Esparza and others to continue in their roles. Consequently, there was no statutory election process.
In such conditions, it was seen again at the STPS. On September 27, Javier Lozano announcement to the media that there was no note-taking because they had been fulfilled or the minimum established by union constitutions.
In short description, the union has been literally no head.
Recently, Esparza stated that replenished the process after refusing more than a year. But statements are not consistent. To reset the election, requests the Board to provide the list of voters, however, that a priori denies the vote to those who have been settled, as well as the delivery of 100 million pesos for expenses.
is said that it would be a political settlement. However, contrary to the announcement, the procedure is not started and there is no agreement.
Some groups have pointed out the need for a minimum agreement among themselves to boost the unit to enable a solution to internal conflict. Is it possible? Probably not. And not because it is necessary, it is, but because the positions Esparza Munoz and are irreducible.
If you think about the unity between the groups and their domes there is no unity possible. The unit must be built on the basis of politics. This means that the base electrician come to constitute temporary coalition with the sole objective of restoring normal trade union in terms of the Act and the statutes.
If so, the alteration of the association will continue normally. It must be defined. Neither Esparza Munoz nor are internal drive factor, they are not valid interlocutors with anyone. Keep the abnormality
internal union has been a catastrophic error.
9. Output electioneering Nearby
resistance anus unexplained events have occurred convincingly. Martin Esparza went to report Enrique Pena Nieto, governor of the State of Mexico (Edomex) and dedicated to praise the ruler who demonstrated very aggressive on October 10, 2009, supporting the police occupation of LFC.
"I'm doing politics," he said in response. It was Rep. Luis Videgaray, candidate to replace Pena Nieto in Edomex invite him to Esparza and has come closer to the PRI.
One of the purposes is to support an eventual reform initiative proposed by the Electricity Act Esparza. According to this initiative, lawmakers would try to create a local company to replace CFLs as if the electricity industry was nationalized property of a group or a few people. Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador
in presidential campaign has made public its support for the initiative Esparza. Knowing that the PRI does not ensure their support, Lopez has said the PRD, PT and Convergencia if endorsed. Obviously, the best, it would be a minority.
To decorate your support, electricians Obrador promises that "to win the 2012 elections" were released to LFC.
political demagoguery tends to deflect more of the resistance. Videgaray be imposed as governor of the State of Mexico but has powers in relation to the electrical industry. Regarding Obrador, its small-town politics is improvised.
Thus, the resistance has reached a year, yet lost and an uncertain outlook and misleading electioneering.
10. Conclusions The FTE
electricians smeitas also military, most are active in resistance, we have settled None. Others are retired and all, we are supporting assets. We are at war and our moral and political quality is tested and proven by the facts.
It hurts a lot to say and note it, but for now, the stage is defeat. Not final because the class struggle continues, but the experience has been unfavorable.
hold the view that the coup was led from outside and from within. Is not the first time this has happened but it is clear that in this case, quiet and did not assess properly the relationship of forces. Precipitate was invited confrontation with the state and this won his reasons of illegality and violence.
evade the nationalized electricity industry was a catastrophic error. Worse is the pretense of returning to the stage prior to nationalization, based on local electric company, within their own integrated electric industry nationwide. Follow
fingering the LSPEE, we conquered us in 1975, is harmful to the nation. If any reform would have to do is repeal the unconstitutional provisions of 1992 which led to the illegal electric privatization.
The "strategy" followed in the past year has failed, legally and politically. The State and its government have taken advantage of the situation without having opposed a socially organized force, neglecting the national and international class solidarity, preferring to charrismo pro-imperialist and international organizations.
bias has been totally unfortunate but the internal division and maintain the abnormal association. The union was beheaded on purpose. In the collapse situation has been complicated throughout any solution difficult. Restore normal
association is a necessity and is capable of achieving internally. If it still will not do it now will have to make later. The procedures are covered by the Act and the statutes of the union.
In this situation, it is inevitable in a coalition formed to restore the normal temporal association replacing the statutory election process, and even reform the statutes.
The conflict is not finally concluded. By omission, and notable deficiencies, replacement by employers CFE, eludió y la invocación del derecho se perdió por omisión deliberada. Queda el juicio a iniciarse en 2011, en condiciones cuesta arriba. Desde el punto de vista colectivo la situación es desfavorable quedando vigentes las demandas individuales.
En el marco de la integración de la industria eléctrica nacionalizada siguen vigentes las propuestas pero se requiere de una política coherente. El escenario de 2010 no es el de 1969, 1973 ó 1975. Hoy las condiciones son muy adversas. El SME, sin embargo, no se ha extinguido ni aún cuando el laudo demoledor se pusiera firme próximamente.
Los jubilados tienen por delante un enorme reto. Hasta ahora han eludido su responsabilidad política. The assets have been slaughtered by the hubris of its "general" policy which has been unfortunate. There are facts and reconstruct the situation is complicated but not impossible.
The coup is against all and are still to be seen the negative effects on workers and the population.
would hope that the players make a political review of the experience. Unions are not anyone's private property, are agencies of social interest, the electricity industry is not nationalized private property of any group or political party is of the nation. Consequently, what happens in the electricity industry commits us all Mexicans.
detailed analysis is relevant experience from within and outside the movement, and draw political conclusions from the case.
free people 
