2010 Price For Sebaceous Cyst Removal

VOTE VOTE. THOMAS MORALES.

VOTE OR NOT TO VOTE, THAT IS THE QUESTION

Azorín I think it was who said that politicians and the people are like water and oil, which never meet. Or, rather, are mixed and stirred only when they are removed with a teaspoon. This happens in meetings. Especially in election campaigns. When they finished, they return to their natural place. politicians, above, as oil and valuable, and the people down, forgotten, like water. Superimposed until the next election. Politics it is necessary that one can not imagine in the XXI century a state without politics, should be, however, a noble activity.

We have a fully political improvements, dispensable. All of it (and I know that this is overkill). But it pisses me off that the slogans and impose voting discipline, always, to the arguments, the reasons. Vote by vote, in obedience to the boss, not by personal choice. I think even Spain to walk better without politicians who claim to represent (at least if the democratic process does not change).

I do not mean hinge parties, nationalist, that Spain give a damn. They are only interested in his homeland. But that has been chosen for their "terruñeros" to milk as much as possible, to that cow named Spain whose caregivers, the two major parties are ... one because you do not know and walk more lost than Adam Day mother dancing Yenka in their political and economic decisions, spinning like a weathervane crazy, disoriented as to where you have to walk, and the other as opposition only wants to govern and that does not say a peep, because the ruling party nor will it make if what you say and will laugh at what he would say, if I said something.

Our politicians:

1 .- They doctored up language. We have a Supreme Court is not supreme because, above it, our politicians have created a device, made half dominated by the two, called the Constitutional Court, whose mission is fundamentally to contradict the Supreme Court is no longer supreme. One of the Tribunals and that is, to be called, well, Supreme.

Machiavelli was a thinker for whom I respect and admiration. The Prince paid him for advice (now that was a good adviser and not the zillions do not know what have advised my President because either it has not done them or damn case or have advised so bad that is why we are where we are, not off the hook). Machiavelli the Prince gave him tips on how to stay in power, if it was in him, and how to recover it if lost. Machiavelli (the real) was not Machiavellian thinker was a sincere and sensible, noble, not at all hypocritical, but realistic. He was a man of his time, at the height of their circumstances.

But Machiavelli (which has gone down in history as "malicious," "cunning "...) was a toddler, a novice compared to Rubalcaba. This man es capaz de convencer a la novia de que la última moda es ir vestida de negro y a la viuda para que se vista de blanco y, así, vaya al funeral. Maneja tan sutilmente el lenguaje que éste ha dejado de tener una función informativa, comunicativa. Le hace decir al lenguaje lo que él quiere que diga, no lo que el lenguaje debería decir.

2.- Le han quitado la ven da a la Justicia y sus platillos están trucados. Éstos se vencen para donde los políticos quieren, aunque sostengan menos peso. La Justicia ha dejado de ser Justa . Uno ya no sabe si esa acción es delictiva o es un mérito de quien la ha realizado. Yo, en otro lugar, la he llamado “Teoría of intermittent ": now it is just now is not fair, now it is just now is not fair .... So that the first thing the offender, pending trial, he asks his defense attorney is: "What judge has touched me, because if ... then .... But if ...

You do not know where I will leave the Justice from releasing an early pluriasesino until convicted of a theft more years for a murder, or to declare innocent or almost innocent, a murderer of pedestrian crossing the zebra crossing because it was / is a "dancer" of flamenco.

do

how long to get a murder conviction, even a murder? If Machiavelli respect, I fear Rubalcaba. With Rubalcaba things are not what they seem and appear to be what they are not. Is able to devise a terrorist group under the name of Sortu, put on lamb and say, in a paper that does not like meat and it will not disturb the herd, so that all farmers (whether they political parties, starting his own) start shooting on Sortu the balls, until they run out of ammunition.

And when the Court (to the overwhelming reports of security forces and state) is declared illegal, get the parts, the Bildu, also the balls, for which and the ammunition is exhausted or the remainder, wet, or is in the hands of the Court Friend, who declares it legal.

If Zapatero was an Adam, Panfilo practicing harmonica, and a representative of Thought-Alicia and naive policy, Rubalcaba is an evil (but in a bad sense of the word), unscrupulous, perfidious, crafty , devious, deceptive, misleading, lying, twisted.

If he can deceive the European leaders as it is to fool so many English, FORWARD TO AS CANDIDATE FOR PRIME MINISTER. Sure-quite sure to be a good president. But I fear that Sarkozy and Merkel smart Fang twisted fools are not like that.

3 .- What can be said about the corrupt politicians who are bribed by a female costumes and other present or affiliates, to award contracts for works, advantages, bountiful buddies?. Because the Board of Andalusia and YOU ... is unclassifiable, linguistically. I had not designated as "unfair" (also) but as "obscene", but I think I have fallen short and do not know what word could reflect, portray what the ARE. For please. Anyone , handle well the dictionary, you can apply the right word?

to tell me, please

4 .- What about my ex-President of Andalusia, which, hemmed in by Paula and Ivan, says she feels insulted and slandered and challenges offenders and slanderers to go to court to terminate? I, so far, (naive me) had thought he was slandered and the victim who was to go to court to denounce the offenders and slanderers.

Even this is an outdated

5 .- And finally. And it hurts my ears, for electoral propaganda . This really is an invasion and violation of domicile. If I stand at the terrace, if I put the radio, if I turn the TV to watch the news, if I open the mailbox, if I buy the press, if I'm lying on the beach and the plane of the balls ... I feel surrounded. But Information (let alone knowledge), but of propaganda and publicity.

anyone know someone that promoting a product, post which is not good or the best?. Is it?. NO. It is propaganda. It's advertising, then it will add cost to the product. Propaganda, not that it is false (Also) not be misleading (also) is that is lying. For the propagandist, knows for certain, it will not be able to fulfill the promises, because "it can not be, can not be, and, moreover, is impossible." How much money (as little as we are of him), political parties are spent on advertising, when, wisely, with having been left in the mailbox of its programs, would be sufficient to tell us?

And the "and you most?. But is not conscious, you drop, which is declared corrupt?. What is only 93% and the other 94%?. True, he is less corrupt, while 93 is less than 94, "but that is a credit?. If you do not even merit not, because that is the norm. Normal is not corrupt.

to report it now or language. A further adulteration. Aturdirte to get you the vote. Lord, forgive them, because they do not know what they do and what they say and also because they take us for fools.

THOMAS MORALES