GREEN INTERVIEW LUIS Luis green has a law degree from the University of Malaga. Bring the Popular Party from 2004. It was also president of New Generation provinicial People's Party. Will in the coming People's Party list at number 17. At 25 years appears to be the youngest candidate presented by the city of Malaga.
For those who do not know who is Luis Verde? Why you decided to enter politics and chose just the PP?
I am very stubborn and conscientious in the work that is involved, whether political, public or professional. Deciding to enter politics was a bug that had since I started having some awareness.
From childhood I used to introduce to delegate. I always had this concern for our rights, not to be trod by students. Once entered the University I started in university policy, which was a great experience to give me much direct contact with the idiosyncrasies of the people. Discover how people are related to you and believe in your project.
Why PP?
I joined between 2004-2006 and had only one thing clear. The Socialist Party was not doing things right. Many injustices were committed, young people begin to lose many of the rights we already have insured.
If we look back in 96 with a Popular Party government, a Malaga, Juan Moreno, national president of New Generations, was able to achieve a historical fact, the elimination of compulsory military service. Seeing as there are people able to move others with an exciting project and be able to make claims about themselves that no one can break down, it was something that caught my attention.
I ask that you ask if we're going to answer this interview as a young man of 25 years with concerns or typical political discourse we often hear
I am a politician and I am young. When people ask me, I try to see it from the point where I live, that is, the young man who is on the street with his companions, the young man who is on the unemployment line, which has half of his family or half of his friends asking explanations.
So are you going to be honest?
as possible. There will be times I may sound like a speech for it is the party that defends the game, but obviously I will not always agree.
You take a short time in politics, what's surprised you most?
On the positive side at the municipal level amazes me how grateful I can be people with small gestures. People will experience certain projects and the fact that help is something that makes you feel good. I am reminded of a girl who last year staged a festival of Indian music and were able to work with them and seeing the face of gratitude is very comfortable and rewarding and makes you get up in the morning and tell you that deserves penalty.
respect to the most negative, sometimes too committed to political injustice. We are a collective frowned upon in society
have done something about it to have that image, right?
The generalization that is made of politicians is what I dislike. There's corruption, of course, not only in the PP, also the PSOE, IU, UPyD ... But we must also look at how politicians are corrupt and how are the rest that makes an ordinary life.
The same applies to young people. If you see the press on youth only see the bottle, vandalism, youth without a license, youth without a future ... You will never see a story of young people studied. We have now reached the generality of all or nothing. If a driver is deceiving you, all taxi drivers are thieves.
usually always listen to the political class doing a critique of the opposing parties, so I ask this time a self-criticism. What has your party done wrong?
What is wrong is not knowing how to sell what he does. When you see the amount of activities, actions, agreements, work done and how little there is to know ... And also, the closeted ourselves in statism. It's something I do not share and that is a mistake.
On the other hand, politics is a blank check for four years in which to give your family, friends ... and I do not know is political from eight to three. If you also have the responsibility have a political office, you become a benchmark. What could be said of me if I am now drunk with the car at three in the morning? As I'm going to sit after a press conference to defend such a campaign against alcohol consumption.
The president of new generations of the Popular Party was caught driving exceeding the maximum rate of alcohol
right, made the mistake of taking the car after a party instead of taking a taxi or walk as we have many. Was a mistake, I assumed, made available to the responsible party, resigned from his responsibilities as a member within the committee Road Safety and gestures like these do not usually see much.
One reason that has led to criticism of politicians are the corruption scandals, especially in his party and the Socialist Party Why no clear answers from political parties to corruption? In the case of Valencia, we see that there are defendants who are on the lists.
The answer is very clear. You have to see that there is a thing called presumption of innocence. A suspect is not the same as a criminal. Based on that difference, why do not you believe a person who says he is innocent? There is some evidence to say that it is induced guilty but not yet concluded the trial. And in that trial may present evidence.
What about the case of Alhaurin el Grande where the evidence seems to confirm the crime of Juan Martin Seron?
The case of Alhaurin el Grande is a case where not yet held a trial. Moreover, as historian memory do you have seen many times that to detain a person has gone national TV media
But that's not what I asked
But when you see it extend a process of this caliber. Today the trial is delayed, and has recently set for after the election. Why not be held before? I would prefer. And the people of Alhaurín too, because people want to keep things clear when you go to vote.
And if corruption is shown, what do you suggest?
immediate expulsion of the party. I think the record should not be personal, when you show up in an acronym, you go with these acronyms. In addition, through this mechanism is in Spain trasfuguismo disappear. Many arrive, they take their act of council and once you leave the party discipline, seeking personal self-interest. It is therefore essential control this aspect.
I spoke before the presumption of innocence. Does Rubalcaba presumption of innocence?
Of course it
In general in his party will not appear.
What we have seen are some records that show the negotiation with ETA. The English government said it was not negotiating with ETA, these records say otherwise.
Gürtel The case has also shown some brought gifts to Mr. Camps
And until no trial, all you're seeing is harassment and demolition by a party.
Like Rubalcaba, right?
The double standard I do not it. To Rubalcaba is no presumption of innocence, and yet there is a siege and demolition to any person other than the Socialist Party. People live with the policy that broadcast media. And each time is less press. What to eat is TV, Internet. I do not mean that television is bad. I mean if you read newspapers you see publishers that are going to give much more information than 20 seconds of TV.
That complaint would understand at IU or UPyD. But in the case of PP and PSOE, it is clear there are certain means to defend their proposals
Do you think that means there are literally behind the PP?
El Diario Sur for example. The coverage given to the PP is higher than that given to other parties
I invite you to see the coverage has been the act of Marco's youth of the PP, you watch the three local media.
But nationwide, if any. The world is going in a line of harassment and demolition of the Socialist Party, and the SER does the same to the Popular Party
If you open the world last Sunday you saw a slap on the cover Rajoy. I've never seen some of the media to even a blow to barbarities and atrocities committed by one party and another. I am totally against extremism. You're never going to hear a speech end. I believe that the plurality is the fact. An organization must agree to all its members. I do not follow an editorial line of a game. I think the advantage of being in policy is to manage much more information than does the ordinary people.
regard to the media, my students are very striking that the same news is interpreted very differently in
media That baffles. If you have 8 years old and your father buys the same medium, it is to go with a speech, but it is really not going to manage information. It is important to read a little of everything because if you stay with some of the information.
One of the groups with high abstention is the youth. Why this is occurring away from the political class from the young? I tell young people have many concerns, yet among those concerns is not politics.
is a big problem. The political class is very frowned upon. You must understand that I defend what I believe, but I'm also a person and what I see is that young people are very difficult because if all they see on TV is that so and so has committed such a crime.
I think the problem of the political class is not aware of the concerns that have
The concerns they have is how to make your home life after. But that is no longer a concern even someone of 198 years, because today is impossible to think 18 years emancipate. The reality of a young man of 18 is what I can do with my life when all I read everywhere is that the country is bankrupt, no jobs, no future unless I go to Germany ...
We try to reach groups. And that social networks are very important. Participation is essential in the collective, we must promote partnerships. We must realize the concerns in the associations and that is where we go.
related criticism of youth policy and more today, with the debate that has been generated about the allowances of MEPs, does it seem unethical to pay with politicians? Or the right to full pension after remaining two terms?
First, what of MEPs is a shame. Regarding the latter, you should keep in mind when you talk about the salary of a politician must make a distinction between municipal, regional or national level. We also have to differentiate the salary he receives from the party or the public. But you should keep in mind that a politician dedicated to this entire day and can not do other things.
The life of a politician is not simply an opening or a town meeting. You note that a councilman gets up early, go to your district, and goes out to work with one and other. When have you seen a councilor at a meeting neighboring joint?
What about pensions?
You have to have in mind as you develop you're seeing these private functions to develop your career. I believe that politics is a blank check every four years. When you give yourself away from politics for four years your life projects can not exceed those four years and considering that everything goes in favor. Privas your profession devote to politics.
I do not know if you know that Julio Anguita resigned from the board and just keep the master that it should have
If he made this decision fully respected
Nationally, statistics show his party as the clear winner. Some PSOE policies like gay marriage and abortion have been widely criticized by his party. Where Luis Verde positions in this regard?
I am in favor of the same sex have the same rights and freedoms that heterosexuals have. What I am against not let you into certain places do not belong to this group. To me, I have been denied access to debates to defend my party's position on gay marriage.
But are you in favor of gay marriage?
I am in favor of the same sex have equal rights. The technicalities of marriage, marriage ... can be a debate open to everyone to expose their position, but can not be the impediment to that today we all have the minimum conditions for better and for worse.
And the abortion law?
The abortion law is causing a sterile debate and is distorting. I think a mistake that today a 14 year old girl can make this determination without their father did not even know it. We are talking about a subject that is beyond the reasoning. Why do I have they signed my daughter who is hiking a permit and yet my daughter 14 years can be aborted without my knowing? I look disproportionate.
Regarding education, the debate focuses on Religion and Education for citizenship and not the real problems of classroom overcrowding
I will talk about the campaigns do. I have not done any campaigning for the religiosity of the classroom, and if in favor of teacher-student ratio. The only policy that I do is that it takes 35 schools to meet actual needs. And above all, the authority has lost the faculty. To date Today, students have more rights than obligations. People will forget a civil code provision that the child must obey.
However, what I teach media are conflicts that occur in classrooms, but that percentage is minimal. A very high percentage of students does not create such problems. The only thing is that their needs are not met
When it comes to education seems that teachers do not know how to teach and that is a mistake. There are two factors that we forget. On the one hand, the real and effective incorporation of women into the labor market means that children spend more time with their teachers, in canteens, on bus routes, on routes outside-school ... have much less contact with their parents.
Today's work is indispensable partner to maintain a mortgage. In many cases it is perceived that parents leave the task of educating the teachers leave and they are only a supplement. And the burden of teaching can not be based in 80% behavior and 20% teaching load. If you do a planning for the entire course and the first evaluation did not fulfill the educational planning because you have to be aware that students behave, as we have a problem and break the schemes. And also the fact that parents are on the line to defend the child to the teachers. And the other problem is that people do not have time to stand before the mirror and say you want and do not want. So imagine for the rest.
There is a point I would like to say congratulations. I refer to the work in the San Rafael cemetery where City Council and Board of Andalusia have been done a deal that has allowed the light shot over 2800 bodies. However, his party nationally seems to be that line in Malaga there has been no controversy. Why, if there is such a national controversy?
postures are often encountered because it attempts see all from one perspective, the opposite perspective comes hard hit. When you do mention that nationals were evil and good were the Republicans or the contrary, we must bear in mind that you can hurt feelings. I personally if affects me, because my grandparents have told me they did terrible things.
If you do a survey of possible mass, with respect and confidentiality. I do not want it to appear media. If there is a body of my family, I want to know me, but not otherwise. The private bank staff should be above everything.
But then, do you agree with the exhumation the bodies of Civil War?
I agree with respect to these families
I say different names and you tell me the first thing that comes to mind
• Aznar. Grand President
• Rajoy. Future great president
• Zapatero.
good publicist
• Rubalcaba. The same face of change
• Carma Chacón. A great candidate. Is not involved in any of the problems Socialist Party. Besides being the first woman minister of defense.
• María Gámez. Disappointing
• Francisco de la Torre . The most dedicated person I have to Malaga
• Pedro Moreno Brenes . Gran Luchador
• Teresa Porras. Great Fighter
• Manuel Diaz. Bright person, an excellent politician.
• Luis Verde . Still young and aspirations to change many things.
of Luis What is Green the great utopia of the world?
I think the great utopia is when we stop making generalizations of all groups and qualify people by name. And do not speak only of politicians. Utopia is access to accurate and unbiased.
0 comments:
Post a Comment